In the course of his consultancy work, he helped international corporations from the pharmaceutical, industrial, health and banking sectors in the event of a crisis and trained his clients in the event of hostage-taking, extortion, kidnapping and acts of violence. He advised both the American FBI and the Russian Interior Ministry . He was a member of an advisory body to the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) for several years . What would a forensic psychologist say about people who refuse to accept responsibility for their actions or that they might have been wrong? He may be attracted to some form of pornography that plays a role in his sexual fantasies. There would be some violent aspects to it and he would fantasize about similar experiences. Paul Britton has helped with most of the high-profile cases that have hit our newspapers and TV screens in the last twenty years. He doesn't glorify the cases he covers, he simply tells the story of their investigation. The police, in most cases, come out looking good. We learn very little about Paul himself, but you cannot help but realise what his job must have cost him. He mentions his faith, and I hope he holds on to it, because nothing else could make sense out of what he sees every week. Our Liverpool Psychology hub is a creative arena that can be utilised to share innovative ideas and opinions with regards to contemporary issues in psychology. Our hub is enthusiastically supported by a strong network of passionate students, researchers and teaching staff who are fully committed to promoting the expanding field of psychology to a wider audience.

Early next year, however, the role of such people will come under close examination when Paul Britton, who has worked on a string of notorious cases over the past 20 years, will appear before a British Psychological Society disciplinary hearing. What he searches for at the crime scene are not frinerprints, fibres or bloodstains - he looks for the 'mind trace' left behind by those responsible: the psychological characteristics that can help the police to identify and understand the nature of the perpetrator. You can't put it down because you wouldn't sleep , until you knew the people responsible for the crimes were safely behind bars. The modern history of what came to be known as "offender profiling" began in the 40s when the US Office of Strategic Services asked William Langer, a psychiatrist, to draw up a profile of Adolf Hitler. After the second world war, Lionel Haward, a psychologist working for the Royal Air Force, drew up a list of characteristics which high-ranking Nazi war criminals might display. Then in the 50s, James A Brussel, a US psychiatrist, drew up what turned to be an uncannily accurate profile of a bomber who had been terrorising New York. Forensic psychologist Paul Britton can 'walk through the minds' of those who murder, rape, torture, extort and kidnap. He can see the world through their eyes and know what they're thinking. That is why the police have called on him to help with many high-profile criminal investigations and catch those responsible.

An intensely private and unassuming man, Britton has an almost mythic status in the field of crime deduction because of his ability to 'walk through the minds' of those who stalk, abduct, torture, rape and kill other human beings. What he searches for at the scene of a crime are not fingerprints, fibres or blood stains - he looks for the 'mind trace' left behind by those responsible; the psychological characteristics that can help police to identify and understand the nature of the perpetrator. A thrilling true-crime classic which will appeal to fans of Dahmer, The Murders at White House Farm, Mindhunter, Making a Murderer, and The Good Nurse Authority data (person): GND : 120174693 ( OGND , AKS ) | LCCN : nb97012919 | VIAF : 53639489 | Wikipedia people search personal data It would be far to easy I feel to assume that the police handle every aspect of a crime on there own. But no one group of people could deal with the workload nor the mental strain involved in such things. Which is why when a case comes up that is something above and beyond the usual people like Britton get called in. There work is to pull apart the destruction caused by such events and try and point there police in the right director. You a better off think of them like hunting dogs, trained to find the tiny clues that make up a trail to the truth. We are all fallible, in the best of crime fiction we want to know why? It is part of what I think makes us human, this needs to try and understand why a serial killer or rapist does what they do. And this is what Britton does, but he also works to help the police get these people to confess to what they have done. For these people, it is there own personal playground and they do not wish for any intruders. They think they are smarter than the police and as such, they can outsmart them. With the help of criminal psychologists, the police can find those small gaps in their defenses and with just the right amount of thought can split them wide open.

From the end of the 1980s to the beginning of the 1990s, the population was unsettled by a series of rapes that took place in the parks in the southern green belt of London connected by the Green Chain Walk . In one case, the perpetrator broke into a residential building located on the road, easily visible from the park, and committed the crime there. Although the victims sometimes gave very different descriptions of the perpetrator, the DNA traces revealed the perpetration of a single man.The study, which was based above all on the questioning of all departments and the data of some criminalistic-psychological institutes of the Ministry of the Interior, shows a disillusioning picture of “ profiling ". The majority of the effort was not effective or even counterproductive. Many creators of perpetrator profiles were incompetent or put other goals such as reputation enhancement and their own financial interests in the foreground. Nevertheless, there were also promising approaches, especially from the university environment and the practical area of ​​clinical psychology. He was then given the task of developing recommendations for promoting the promising approaches. These included the expansion of a central database for violent crimes, a quality analysis of the perpetrator profile after each investigation and the drafting of a computer program to identify common features in violent crimes committed by serial perpetrators to be able to find earlier, as well as the training of investigators. Paul Britton, a successful forensic/criminal psychologist, goes into detail on some of the most horrific cases the UK has seen. He discusses his role in the House of Horrors, the contamination of Heinz products, and the abduction of a newborn baby, as well as countless other murders and rapes. In a nutshell, its a detective story which involves some of the most riveting criminal cases in Britain – the cases feel so much more real because they are so close to home. It has never been clarified why the previous suspect had perpetrator knowledge in the second case. One could only assume that he observed the crime and then carried out the mistreatment on the corpse, which the murderer denied despite admitting the crime. Product extortion from Mars Incorporated and HJ Heinz Company

His appearance before the British Psychological Society stems from a complaint about Colin Stagg's treatment. It is understood that it has taken so long for the society to put the allegations before Britton because of the possibility that civil action would be taken against the psychologist. One of the first mass genetic tests in history caught the real culprit Colin Pitchfork, who confessed to the rapes and murders . Above all, the hint from Paul Britton that such perpetrators would "increase" and in the past had often become suspicious of the police through more harmless sexual offenses such as exhibitionism , provided additional knowledge for future investigations. This was also the case in this case. This does give the book a slightly repetitive feel sometimes, as whilst there is variation in the methodology of both killer and investigations and the personalities involved on both sides of the law, it sometimes feels as if Britton is working from a template to tell his side of these crimes. His tone doesn’t vary an awful amount either, being largely dispassionate and it sometimes feels as if he is writing a textbook or the basis for a lecture series. Although he does occasionally let his emotions show, usually when he sees the victim, or pictures of the victim, for the first time, the tone and pace of his writing doesn’t change a huge amount and it almost reads as if he’s expressing emotions because it feels like the right thing to do, rather than because he actually feels anything. What he searches for at the scene of the crime are not fingerprints – he looks for the ‘mind trace’ left behind by those responsible: the psychological characteristics that can help the police identify and understand the nature of the perpetrator.” Britton came to psychology late. He spent a year as a police cadet, then took a series of jobs before studying psychology in his late 20s. While working at a psychiatric hospital in Leicestershire, he was asked, informally, to help in a murder inquiry. His reputation grew and he became head of the regional forensic psychology service. He was consulted on some of the most notorious crimes of the 80s and 90s, from the kidnapping of Stephanie Slater to the horrors of Fred and Rosemary West's house.It was a good but frustrating read. I’d still read more books by Paul Britton but I’d definitely take what he says with more of a pinch of salt than I did when I started reading this one. I was surprised about the level of information Britton gives on some very well known crimes and so if you are interested in true crime then this is a book for you, I think that it helps if you remember the main cases that he talks about but this isn’t essential as he will give you more than enough detail. I really did enjoy reading it and found it fascinating, but I would have liked Britton to make himself more human and show that he isn’t perfect and did sometimes get it wrong, and perhaps what he learnt from that. His failure to do that makes me question the book and how true to life it really is, especially when, for example, he states that he believed that The West’s had eaten some of their victims due to marks on the bones, I have not been able to find anything else to substantiate this and even though I know that it would be impossible for it to be proven given the death of Fred West and the silence of Rose, it is something that I would expect to be discussed somewhere if there had been any evidence of that. As well as his psychological profiles, Britton talks about his personal experience with working with the police, and how his personal life was affected. He also mentions his NHS career in psychology.

After primary school , he failed the entrance exams ( Eleven Plus Exam ) to the high school branch of a secondary school. Later he complained that only the children from the better families received sufficient support from the school to be able to pass this test, while the children of the lower classes did not receive this special instruction. As a result, all children of the lower classes failed the test, while those of middle class families, regardless of intellectual level, passed it due to the thorough preparation on the part of the teachers. Despite the maximum school leaving certificate that he can now achieve, the British equivalent of the secondary school leaving certificate , the desire to study arose early on. Britton has done hugely important work that saves lives. He is fascinating. His book is compelling The Sunday TimesFor psychologists such as Canter the idea of a lone psychologist being called in ad hoc to help in police investigations cannot work. When he is asked at what point a psychologist should be brought into a police investigation his reply is simply: "Before the crime." An appalling, self-serving book full of pop-psychology and in some cases downright false claims. For instance, Britton tries to play down his role in the investigation of Colin Stagg in the Wimbledon Common Murder case, despite the fact that he was advising the police even while they were interviewing Stagg at the time of his first arrest. German: The profile of the murderer - The spectacular success method of the British criminal psychologist Paul Britton. Econ Verlag, Munich 1998, ISBN 3-430-11564-7 .